Skip to main content

Terence Tao Runs the Mathematician Gauntlet

Terence Tao runs the gauntlet of GOAT mathematicians. How far does he stop? Or does he clear?

May the best mathematician win.

Terence Tao

Round 1: Laplace

Round 2: Lagrange

Round 3: Cauchy

Round 4: Gauss

Round 5: Euler



Feats for Terence Tao:

  • Widely considered the world's best mathematician
  • One of the youngest Fields Medalists
  • Won the IMO Gold Medal at age 13, the youngest in history
  • Has done work in multiple different branches of math, contributing significantly to each
    • Examples would be his work in the Collatz conjecture and Navier Stokes problem
  • Called "The Mozart of Math"
  • It has been stated that the best way to figure out a problem is to get Terence Tao interested in it
  • Authored/Co-authored over 300 research papers
R1: Laplace has an incredible resume, to put it lightly. He has been called the Newton of France, and is stated to have been superior to the vast majority of his colleagues. He is known for foundational ideas, such as the Laplacian, Laplace's equation, and the Laplace transform, to list a few. But even more important than that, he is arguably one of the sole founders of (modern) celestial mechanics, by translating the previously geometric work into calculus. Not only that, he predicted the existence of black holes, more than 2 centuries before Albert Einstein's groundbreaking work would lay the mathematical foundation for their existence, and 250+ years before their experimental proof. Based on these feats alone, I would be tempted to give this victory to Laplace.
However, one has to be fair when comparing mathematicians from the 18th century to those from the 21st century. Mathematics was far "simpler" back then, requiring far less specialization and allowing for more breadth of knowledge. In addition, statistically, it would actually make sense for Tao to be more intelligent, due to the massive difference in population.
Despite all these facts, I am still leaning toward giving Laplace the W here. His massive influence is absolutely undeniable, along with his incredible predictive skills. Being compared to Newton is incredible, and shows the level that he operated on.
Because of this, I say that Laplace wins. Terence Tao unfortunately does not progress further than this.
As the hater below me once said, these guys don't compare to the real GOATs.


Comment below, and let me know if you agree or disagree!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ethan vs Seyed

NOTE: ALL CHARACTERS ARE ENTIRELY FICTIONAL. ANY RELATION TO REAL-LIFE INDIVIDUALS IS PURELY COINCIDENTAL. This match-up was requested by Ethan Roberts (no relation to the Ethan in this post). Location: Blinker City, Yodieland. Round 1: Boxing Round 2: MMA Round 3: Anything goes (Street Fight) Both characters are in their respective primes. Rounds end through knockout.  Strength: Seyed >= Ethan. His strength feats scale above what we have seen Ethan do so far in the story.  Speed: Ethan >= Seyed. Based on feats from the soccer arc, we can place Ethan's short-distance speed at or above Seyed's.  Combat Speed: Ethan >= Seyed. Similar to the point above, the soccer arc places Ethan's reaction time and reflexes above Seyed's. Examples of this would be his defensive skills and his ability to dive in accurately. Durability: Seyed > Ethan. Ethan has shown no substantial durability feats so far, while Seyed has shown to be capable of tanking hits from heavy hitters
9 comments
Read more

Introduction.

 Hello. This is the Versus blog. My goal is to compare any two characters in a 1 versus 1 fight and determine the winner. The contestants will be chosen either by comments left on the previous post or if no comments were left, I will determine the winners. The contestants can even be real people (unless I'm not allowed to do that or something) so use your imagination I guess. Also, make the matchup somewhat reasonable. Pepa Pig vs Galactus is not a fun matchup. The general criteria used are below, but it is subject to change depending on the characters. For example, for two intellectual characters, stats will be more mentally oriented versus the Haki and Devilfruit stats that I would introduce for One Piece characters. 1. Strength 2. Speed 3. IQ 4. Battle IQ 5. Skill 6. Reflexes 7. Durability 8. Abilities 9. Hax 10. Tools Comment the match-up for next week, and I'll see YOU in the Arena!
8 comments
Read more

George Washington vs King George (III)

   NOTE: ALL CHARACTERS ARE ENTIRELY FICTIONAL. ANY RELATION TO REAL-LIFE INDIVIDUALS IS PURELY COINCIDENTAL. In honor of the US vs England Soccer match that happened. Both characters are in their prime. Round 1: Boxing Round 2: Street Fight 1. Strength. Washington >> King George. King George was a bum who was too busy sitting on his throne to do any physical activities. Meanwhile Washington chopped down trees, fought on the front lines, and maintained a solid physique. 2. Speed. Washington >> King George. Same as above. 3. Combat Speed. Washington >> King George. Same as above. 4. Durability. Washington >> King George. Washington is nigh-invulnerable, as shown when he tanked several shots during the Revolutionary War at near point-blank range. However, some say this is a property of his coat. 5. Battle IQ. Washington >> King George. Washington was a tactical genius in comparison to King George who sat around doing nothing on his throne. 6. Experience. Was
2 comments
Read more